Good but can be a little less serious too.

Links and labs seems a bit outdated

in some videos text is not readable

Video quality is not great.

enough

ok

The overall content of the course was good, however there were spelling mistakes everywhere and overall a somewhat poor presentation of the learning material. The labs had to be completed using virtual machines which were slow and very burdensome to use. There was seemingly absolutely no engagement from any instructors with pupils taking the course.

Tedious. Video modules were poorly edited (there is a time when the presenter stops, fixes a typo, then starts that slide over). Actual diagrams were nowhere to be found. Videos that reviewed the labs were set up so the text on the screen was so tiny it was illegible, while most of the screen was useless space.

The material is a bit outdated. The slides shown in the videos and some of the written instructions have several spelling mistakes. But the worst issue is the quality of some videos where you are supposed to see how the instructor codes something to solve it. It is impossible to see the code.

First of all I wouldn't recommend taking this because the course hasn't been updated for a couple of years and it looks like nobody's upkeeping it,

Material is decent, labs are very easy but not so clear

Labs are done through a browser embedded VM using Eclipse and it's just horrible.

You must have prior JavaEE knowledge to understand what the instructor is talking about. Also, the transcript is not always available and sometimes not synced with the instructor especially in the first lectures, and the screen resolution in the labs is very bad and not clear.

the coach is very helpful and the graded quiz is a good way of recapping the knowledge. But the quality of the videos is not good enough (resolution, in-video corrections of the slides...). The lab is slow and needs a new launch everytime it opens again.

Having paid for courseera I was expecting detailed explanation of the subject with appropriate examples. The presenter seems to be just reading the slides. We can find far better videos and explanation of Spring on youtube which are free.

lab resulation is really bad , when I open the lab via MacBook Pro (15-inch, 2017) it was hard to do anyting.

I have a background on spring , it was nice to referach my knowledge , some of the topics are new to me.

Скучное монотонное повествование, виртуальный рабочий стол для лабораторных работ просто ужасен, никак не настроить нормальное разрешение экрана, всегда часть обрезана.

Its hard to work with the lab, video quality is poor, sometimes the screen is almost impossibly small to follow, too many typos.

Material is sloppy and difficult to understand. Labs are difficult to get working.

Instructor is not clear on which part of ppt he is on, labs videos are no visible

los videos tienen baja calidad, deberia de ser mas practico el curso

The instructor is just reading through slides

Labs solutions aren't clear

no

The info of the course is good but the quality of video for lab solution walkthrough is super blur, not a single word or code could be read clearly. Having bad experience on Course Lab because of the Lab quality itself is poor, laggy and slow. Wasted alot of time during lab. The lab instructions is not clear enough and the lab solution walkthrough is different from what lab instructions ask for.

Contents are not clear.

The instructor is monotonous and boring.

There are a lot of mistakes on the texts.

On some videos, subtitles are completely different of what the instructor is saying.

Some videos of exercise resolution, can not be seen because the resolution is very low.

It's the most horrible course I've ever seen

The quiz at the end of week two contains two big errors, I wonder if anyone proof read it.

That this course even mentions, and even starts of with, XML is just a big misstake. That way of configuring spring must have been dead for some years now ;)